← All sessionsOpen in Markdown reader
Lesson 12 — Capstone and Professional Practice
Duration: 120 minutes
Included delivery track: Follow LAB_SETUP.md for the supplied files and local simulation. Required activities use these materials; connected deployments are optional extensions. Instructor debrief: answer key. Real OAuth, cloud releases and payments are simulated or discussed through evidence packets.
Deck: 12-capstone-and-professional-practice
Lab: Defensible QA Verdict
Learners will be able to
- independently frame and test a feature/business workflow;
- use AI responsibly across investigation, documentation, and optional automation;
- deliver a concise evidence-backed QA verdict to a product/engineering audience; and
- identify their next apprenticeship track: exploratory QA, automation, integration QA, accessibility/visual QA, or AI evaluation.
Instructor preparation
Assign fixtures/capstone-cards.md. These are public/open-book tasks, not hidden exams. Choose a changed condition after the initial verdict and assess fresh reasoning. Provide one reviewer per four teams, with parallel panels for larger cohorts.
Agenda
| Time |
Facilitation |
| 0–10 |
Arrival: revisit Lesson 1’s question, “Would you ship on this?” Learners state how their answer process has changed. |
| 10–20 |
Explain capstone rules, evidence bar, role rotation, and review cadence. |
| 20–70 |
Teams plan and execute. Instructor acts only as product owner for clarifying questions; teams own their AI task briefs and evidence. |
| 70–80 |
Break and evidence organization. |
| 80–112 |
Up to four teams per panel: five-minute verdict plus three-minute changed-condition defense per team. Require risk, evidence, uncertainty and next action. |
| 112–117 |
Individual written retrospective: strongest skill, useful AI habit and next skill. |
| 117–120 |
Completion recognition and supervised apprenticeship next steps. |
Assessment
Use all templates. A capstone must include a test charter, a credible evidence packet, an AI-use record, and a release/fix recommendation calibrated to uncertainty. Grade individuals through role rotation and the retrospective, not only team polish.