AIQAA certification review — private instructor record
Copy into approved private storage before filling. Never commit a completed copy. Apply the two-award policy, criteria version AIQAA-1.0.
- Learner alias and private identity-record reference:
- Product repo URL, approved scope and agreed equivalents:
- Reviewed release/tag and exact commit:
- Approved assessment agreement version/SHA and current applicability confirmed:
- Completed per-criterion evidence worksheet, covering all 21 rubric criteria and each required condition:
- Ongoing review dates and exact PR/head SHAs:
- Individual presentation date with Jared:
Decision 1 — course completion
- Learning activities completed or approved equivalents evidenced:
- Assigned learning work submitted; project/reflection presented:
- Decision: course complete / course activities outstanding:
- Outstanding activities and make-up plan, if any:
- Approved by Jared / approval date / completion certificate issued date:
Product deficiencies do not by themselves mean the learning activities are incomplete.
Decision 2 — demonstrated competence
Apply the operational rubric. The area summary below rolls up its three required criteria: demonstrated only when all three are demonstrated; an observed failure is not yet demonstrated; missing inspection is unverified. Record both kinds of gap if present. No area-level impression can override a failed or unverified criterion.
| AIQAA-1.0 area | Demonstrated / not yet demonstrated / unverified | Evidence, exact revision and observed explanation | Specific next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Useful working software | |||
| Visual and interaction quality | |||
| QA reasoning and evidence | |||
| Development over time | |||
| GitHub understanding | |||
| Responsible, effective AI use | |||
| Business communication and handoff |
History and GitHub trace
- Early plan/kickoff evidence:
- Intermediate working slice evidence:
- Test/fix and design-refinement evidence:
- Release preparation, tag and handoff evidence:
- At least three substantive human review links:
- Issue → branch → PR → feedback → fix → release chain discussed:
- Learner explanation of a diff, review response and check:
- Squashed/rewritten/offline history context and corroborating evidence:
- Unverified claims or unresolved concerns (private, evidence-based):
No counts-only judgment, manufactured milestones or AI-issued verdict. Course completion plus all seven areas demonstrated is required for certification.
- Certification decision: certified / not yet demonstrated / review pending:
- Criterion IDs not yet demonstrated / unverified, with exact gaps:
- Safety/integrity/environment/disagreement holds and their resolution:
- Independent second review / calibration reference, where required:
- Readiness under the rubric (or optional local checker); never automatic issuance:
- Certification gaps and follow-up appointment:
- Final decision authorized by Jared / date:
- Criteria version: AIQAA-1.0
- Credential ID, if assigned / AIQAA certificate issued date:
- Any public-sharing choice, recorded separately:
© 2026 Jared Cluff.